Write my try
For 1: The House of Lords is unelected accordingly do not represent the nation.
For 2: The Lords are appointed because life and therefore cannot be secluded from office.
For 3: The Lords are of no use and get overridden by the Commons. We emergency a chamber with power.
For 4: It is anachronistic as being a democratic state to have ~y unelected chamber of parliament.
For 5: But it's WRONG.
Against 1: The Commons represents the population: a second chamber in a unitary affirm cannot duplicate this effect, as it would have existence both absurd and constitutionally harmful.
Against 2: Their life arrangement. means they do not have to constantly be directed over their shoulders at the total vote box and vote the way the combination wants them or to bend to populist demands. Their ~ment is for what makes sense legislatively, not which is popular.
Against 3: Firstly, the Lords does greater amount of valuable work for parliamentary scrutiny in the UK than ~y elected House could do, simply on this account that the Commons doesn't have the time to perform it in their legislative timetable, and they are thoroughly bullied ~ means of party leaders into not asking uneasy questions, unless they are prepared to waste their party's support over it. Secondly, from adventitious examples, election does not come with power; there are many second chambers, what one. are more impotent than the Lords.
Against 4: Says who? Never consider your system on some arbitrary register. If it works, it works. An elected House would purpose untold damage and fix an visionary problem that doesn't need repairing.
Against 5: Boo frickin' hoo.
The Lord all a~ ago ceased to be a by inheritance chamber. It's a House of experts immune from one leadership pressure and does superior toil to the Commons.
AND FINALLY: Caliban makes the be at fault of assuming that an elected support chamber is automatically superior to every appointed chamber of experts. Well, in that place are a few strong and effectual second chambers, namely the German Bundesrat and the Australian and US...
No comments:
Post a Comment