Santa

п»ї

Write brief discourse

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, et al., )
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
Case No. 07cv11446-NG
)
JOEL TENENBAUM,
)
Defendant.
)
GERTNER, D.J.:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
December 7, 2009
I.

INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -1-

II.

EQUITABLE DEFENSE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -8-

III.

SUMMARY JUDGMENT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -9A. Legal Standard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -9B. Fair Use Standard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -11C. Fair Use Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -151. Statutory Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -16a. Purpose and Character . . . . . . . . . . . -16b.

Nature of the Copyrighted Work . . . -18c.
Portion of the Work Used . . . . . . . . . -19d.
Effect ~ward the Potential Market for the
Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -212. Non-statutory Factors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -24a. Assumption of Risk . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -25b.
Marketing Activities and Failure to
Protect . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -28c. Availability of Paid Alternatives . . . -30d.
Policing Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -33e.
The Injustice of this Action . . . . . . . -34-

IV.

CONCLUSION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . -35-

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS
SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, et al., )
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
Case No. 07cv11446-NG
)
JOEL TENENBAUM,
)
)
Defendant.
GERTNER, D.J.:
MEMORANDUM AND...

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

SONY BMG MUSIC ENTERTAINMENT, et al., )

Plaintiffs, )

)

v. ) Case No. 07cv11446-NG

)

JOEL TENENBAUM, )

Defendant. )

GERTNER, D.J.: TABLE OF CONTENTS

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

December 7, 2009

I. INTRODUCTION .................................................. -1-

II. EQUITABLE DEFENSE ............................................. -8-

III. SUMMARY JUDGMENT ........................................... -9-

A. Legal Standard ......................................... -9-

B. Fair Use Standard ...................................... -11-

C. Fair Use Analysis ...................................... -15-

1. Statutory Factors ........................... -16-

a. Purpose and Character ........... -16-

b. Nature of the Copyrighted Work ... -18-

c. Portion of the Work Used ......... -19-

d. Effect forward the Potential Market for the

Work ......................... -21-

2. Non-statutory Factors ....................... -24-

a. Assumption of Risk .............. -25-

b. Marketing Activities and Failure to

Protect ........................ -28-

c. Availability of Paid Alternatives ... -30-

d. Policing Costs .................. -33-

e. The Injustice of this Action ....... -34-

IV. CONCLUSION ................................................... -35-

Continues for 40 more pages »

Read replete document

Full access is free in favor of registered users.

Add to Library  (0) Hide

Essay in favor of safe